DSLR and Handheld Duke It Out

Tulip of Fire 020 I did an experiment last night at the suggestion of my father-in-law, Jim. We took some tulips from the dinner table, placed them in a spot of sunshine on the floor and shot pictures with both my Nikon D70s Digital SLR (6.1 megapixels) and his Canon PowerShot A510 digital handheld camera (3.2 Megapixels). He thought it would make a good article for the blog to see the differences in the images of both cameras. I didn’t think there would be much of a difference except in resolution and what the lenses could do. But oh, how wrong I was!

Firetulip Canon The first shot above was taken with my Nikon DSLR (fitted with a +4 Diopter using my 18-70mm lens). The shot on the right was taken with his Canon point-and-shoot. There’s a huge difference in color rendition. Granted, some of that can be explained with differences in white balance, but that doesn’t explain it all. This was by no means a scientific experiment, and the light was slightly different in both shots. My objective wasn’t to skew things in one direction or the other, but I was really surprised to see how flat and reddened the color became with the PowerShot. The flower lost all its fire and the yellow in the flower all but disappeared. In looking at the flowers themselves the colors are much closer to the Nikon’s rendition.

Jim’s Canon A510 did a great job of getting close focus using the Macro setting on a 6mm lens. (For more on using the macro setting, click here).

This experiment made me anxious to try the same thing with my Canon PowerShot A70 (before my tulips croaked out). I placed the flower in the window and took shots with both my Canon PowerShot A70 (3.2 Megapixels) and my Nikon. Here are the results (Nikon D70s top Canon PowerShot bottom):

Tulip of Fire Nikon 002 Tulip of Fire My Canon3

The glow and fire is lost with the Canon, but I chalk that up to resolution and lens quality. You can’t expect the same quality of image with a DSLR and a point-and-shoot.  But the shots are not wildly different, so that raises the question about Jim’s Canon A510.  It’s a really good camera and I’m surprised by the results (could be flaws in my experiment?).  This very un-scientific experiment has definitely raised questions for me. I may have to do a broader experiment with more controllable factors and compare all three cameras side-by-side. Shayne can help me with that. He’s all about the scientific method, right, Shayne?

About Stephanie Simpson

Stephanie Simpson is a Los Angeles-area family and child photographer, specializing in happy shots and fun colors. She also teaches Cinematography and The Business of Film and Television at Azusa Pacific University. Visit her website at: www.ispeakfilm.com

About This Post
Posted on:
April 17, 2006 
Categories:
Blog Entries 
Tags:
, ,  
Link to This:
Click to show links...

Responses and Conversations

You still get washed out color in the Canon shot. I personally think that most P&S cameras are calibrated to provide a very even tone with little contrast on purpose – just to make taking generic pictures easier. I sometimes wonder if there are hacks that can be done on a P&S to get the color a little more interesting. I know on our Canon P&S the B&W setting really increases the overall contrast, so there must be SOMETHING that can be done.


do you understand that you are comparing a p&s against a dslr right?


Leave a Comment

Want to make commenting faster and easier? Register today!